One common critique of artificial intelligence is that it is insufficiently concerned with natural intelligence.

• A. Insufficiently concerned with natural intelligence.
• B. It has no real-world impact.
• C. It relies solely on symbolic reasoning with no data.
• D. It already solves all cognitive tasks.

Answer: (A)

The main idea tested is recognizing a common critique that artificial intelligence often doesn’t engage enough with how natural, human intelligence works—the ways humans think, learn, and reason in real life. The best match is the option that repeats that exact concern, since the statement itself is describing that particular critique: AI is criticized for being insufficiently concerned with natural intelligence. That’s why it correctly captures the point being made.

The other statements don’t fit this critique: claiming AI has no real-world impact ignores the very real effects AI has in everyday life; saying it relies solely on symbolic reasoning with no data contradicts how much of modern AI is data-driven (and many systems use learning from data rather than purely symbolic rules); and claiming AI already solves all cognitive tasks is plainly false and contradicts the known limitations of AI.